It is worth pointing out that here the term expropriation is intended in its pure Latin etymological meaning: "proprius" = one's own, with the prefix "ex" = deprivation of.
This meaning is "pure" in that it excludes the part of the definition, often added, related to a compensation for the expropriated: creeping expropriation does not provide any compensation at all, as its purpose is predatory, hostile, and ultimately suppressive in the first place.
The technniques of social engineering can combine or be derived from one another. Creeping expropriation is the application of the boiling frog technique to the sense of property to the aim of destroying it, destroying with it a piece of the puzzle, and thus contributing to the destruction of all the puzzle.
It consists of gradually shifting you from the idea that the normality be that the things of your life belong to you to the idea that the normality be that the things of your life do NOT belong to you.
"You'll own nothing, and you'll be happy." Signed: World Economic Forum
Our acceptance or even appreciation of creeping expropriation is proof and measure of both how much we have been brainwashed, and how much we have been made inept: reluctant or incapable of doing.
This because taking care is intrisic to owning: if the fact that something belongs to you is an incentive for you to take care of it, the fact that something does not belong to you is an incentive for you not to take care of it.
And taking care is an incentive to be strong and capable, while not taking care is an incentive to be weak and inept.
And when predators attack your survival factors, being the owner of them is an incentive to actively defend them, while being not the owner of them is an incentive to submit passively.
Moreover, there's a direct relationship between property and freedom: without full control over one's survival factors one is not free, and one cannot have full control over one's survival factors without being their owner.
