The principle of risk spreading has a more universal applicability that it would appear at first sight:
If a business has only one customer, or only one supplier, and that customer or that supplier sneezes...
If a big hall has only one emergency exit, and a fire breaks out...
If a car has only one brake circuit, and it fails...
This far, it's quite evident.
Now let's go beyond the first sight.
If your government imposes to you the monopoly of the money of monetary manipulators...
If your government imposes to you the services of the banking oligopoly...
If your government imposes to you what your children must study...
If your government imposes to you what it wants into your body...
If your government imposes to you restrictions to your fundamental freedom and natural rights...
If the judges rule that all of this is legal...
And you can't change your government nor your judges...
Because it's a dictatorship...
And because it's a one world government...
Is the principle of risk spreading evident enough even beyond first sight?