When we realise we are being targeted by a systematic and incessant social engineering, we also realise that one of its branches is an as much underhanded as hammering propaganda to push us into being in certain ways: to conform us to certain human and social models.
At first sight, these models are the most disparate; some examples are:
the eternal adolescent, who lives of sofa, videogames and convenience food delivered to his door;
the career hamster, convinced that life is running to death into his wheel;
the cocktail cicada, who lives of chit-chat and entertainment for their own sake;
the animal fancier, who pampers his or her own worse than a brat and, if possible, hates humans;
the dehumanised youngster, capable only to self-dehumanise more and more;
the lost identity, captured in the tuna fishery of "gender fluidity";
the disintegrated family, where normality is the exception, a guilt and the root of all evil.
At first sight, social resonances of these models are the most disparate, too: the eternal adolescent, the career hamster and the cocktail cicada tend to go unnoticed, the disintegrated family is considered normal or in any case unavoidable and above all spontaneous, while the dehumanised youngster and the lost identity tend to cause more commotion.
Being these models we're hammered with so dissimilar from one another, the question may surprise:
Do they have something in common?
The answer may surprise, too - or maybe not:
Yes. They do.
What is, then, the common element in all the social models we're hammered with by propaganda?
Preventing procreation and education.
The eternal adolescent thinks about videogames, not about starting a family.
The career hamster thinks about running into his wheel, not about starting a family.
The cocktail cicada thinks about fleeing the vacuum, not about starting a family.
The animal fancier thinks of pampering the surrogate, not about starting a family.
The dehumanised youngster thinks about playing the victim, not about starting a family.
The lost identity thinks about going astray, not about starting a family.
The disintegrated family thinks about coping or self-destructing, not about restoring itself.
As the future of life depends on procreation, and as the future of civilisation depends on education, the common element of the social models they try to impose on us is...
our extinction.
