The term ownership here is without adjectives not by chance, but to indicate that we are moving at a more fundamental level than that of the ingenuous diatribe beween collectivists and non-collectivists, a diatribe as usual artfully created and fomented by puppeteers behind the scenes for the purpose of "divide et impera", divide and rule.
What is under attack is the concept itself of belonging of things, earlier still, and the underpinning of, who owns them.
At the root there is one of the characteristic traits of suppressive, antisocial, sociopathic persons: the very bad sense of ownership. For them, nothing is really owned.
At the opposite extreme there is one of the characteristic traits of the ethical relation between us and this world: to make things go well we must take care of them, and ownership is an incentive to take care of them, while the absence of ownership is an incentive not to take care of them.
And it is an objective fact, immune of arbitrary opinions: just compare the average state of things belonging to someone to that of abandoned things.
Moreover, there's a direct relationship between property and freedom, and between survival and independence: without survival factors one does not survive, without full control over one's survival factors one is not free, and one cannot have full control over one's survival factors without being their owner.
It therefore becomes evident how the push for the cancellation of the concept of ownership itself is suppressive, and at the same time one of the characteristic traits of the suppressive, and one of his precise tools strategic in pursuing his purpose: our annihilation.
And finally it is worth emphasising that ownership is an amplifier of the depressing effect of criminals on society:
If those who govern apply the foundation of Evil of rewarding the worse and punishing the better, and thus give criminals a pat on the back instead of stopping them, as a consequence good people slide into apathy because they see that the things they need to survive are not safe: any criminal can come and steal or ruin them because no one defends them.
Criminals protect criminals, not good people, isn't it?
